From: Breaking Legal News
For now, the only way Californians can watch the trial over the
constitutionality of the state's ban on same-sex marriage is to
take a trip to the federal courthouse on Golden Gate Avenue in San
Francisco.Just an hour before the trial got under way Monday, the
U.S. Supreme Court halted for at least two days the judge's plans
to allow video of the proceedings to be uploaded on a delayed basis
on YouTube. The 8-1 decision also prevented live simulcasts from
being broadcast at the federal appeals court building at Seventh
and Mission streets and at courthouses in Seattle, Pasadena,
Portland, Ore., and Brooklyn, N.Y.The court said it wanted until at
least Wednesday to consider arguments by backers of Proposition 8,
the November 2008 ballot measure outlawing same-sex marriage, that
camera cover...
Respond to this topic on your own blog
Click and press Ctrl+C to copy and paste this discussion on your blog or site
Related Articles
Court blocks broadcast of trial on Calif. ban of gay marriage
The Supreme Court on Monday morning temporarily blocked a federal
judge in San Francisco from showing on YouTube proceedings from a
trial that will determine whether a ban on same-sex marriage is
unconstitutional. The court's decision is not the final word; the
stay sought by same-sex marriage opponents expires Wednesday. The
court said that will permit justices "further consideration." The
trial is scheduled to start Monday. Justice Stephen G. Breyer was
the only justice to object. "I agree with the court that further
consideration is warranted, and I am pleased that the stay is
time-limited," Breyer wrote. But he said the court's standards for
issuing a stay were not met because there is not a likelihood of
"irreparable harm" if the proceedings were available on the
Internet. Two bay are...
Supreme Court bars broadcast of Prop 8 trial in California
The Supreme Court split along ideological lines Wednesday as it
barred a federal judge in San Francisco from broadcasting a
high-profile trial involving same-sex marriage. The court issued an
unsigned opinion that said lower courts had not followed proper
procedure in approving plans for the broadcast. The trial is to
consider the constitutionality of Proposition 8, California's ban
on same-sex marriage, and the Supreme Court cited arguments from
proponents of the ban that releasing video of witnesses could
subject them to harassment and even physical danger. The court's
liberal bloc -- joined for the first time in an ideological split
by Sonia Sotomayor, the new justice -- issued a strong dissent. It
said the court's "extraordinary legal relief" was unjustified. The
majority "identifies n...
Judge's ruling ready in Calif. gay marriage case
The first word on whether California's same-sex marriage ban passes
scrutiny under the U.S. Constitution is scheduled to come down
Wednesday when a federal judge issues his ruling in a landmark
case.Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker has reached a decision
on whether to uphold or overturn the voter-approved ban known as
Proposition 8 and plans to publish his opinion in the afternoon,
court spokeswoman Lynn Fuller said.His verdict comes in response to
a lawsuit brought by two same-sex couples and the city of San
Francisco seeking to invalidate the law as an unlawful infringement
on the civil rights of gay men and lesbians.Proposition 8, which
outlawed gay marriages in California five months after the state
Supreme Court legalized them, passed with 52 percent of the vote in
November 200...
Federal judge overturns California gay marriage ban (Lead, changing dateline)
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge overturned California’s ban
on same sex marriage, saying that the voter-approved restriction
violated the highest law of the land, the US constitution. The
ruling Wednesday by Judge Vaughn Walker overturned a 2009 ruling by
the California Supreme Court that upheld a state-wide ballot
proposition in 2008 that reserved marriage for ... Read more :
Federal judge overturns California gay marriage ban (Lead, changing
dateline).
Court Mulls California's Proposition 8
A federal court turned to historians Tuesday as it considers the
constitutionality of Proposition 8, an amendment that banned
same-sex marriage in California. Harvard professor Nancy Cott told
a federal court in San Francisco that child rearing was only one of
several purposes of marriage, not "the central or defining
purpose," the Los Angeles Times reports.She noted that that divorce
rates rose steeply in the 1960s and marriage continued to be viewed
negatively in the 1970s as heterosexuals advocated "open marriages"
and "swinging." But divorce rates hit a plateau in the 1980s, and
marriage is now held in high esteem in the U.S., she said.She
attributed the higher status of marriage to advocacy by the
Christian right and the growing clamoring of gays and lesbians to
participate in it.Dur...
